نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract
Background:
The relationship between psychoanalysis and art has a long and intricate history and has since evolved through a complex trajectory. Despite this long history, psychoanalytic theories of art remain fragmented and call for a more systematic historical and conceptual synthesis.
Objective:
The present study aims to review and critically analyze the developmental trajectory of psychoanalytic perspectives on art and the creative process.
Method:
This study was conducted as a narrative review, integrating data from 97 articles and books retrieved from major academic databases. In the first stage of the search, 2,405 records were identified. In the second screening stage, 594 articles were selected for title and abstract review, and finally, 380 full texts were examined in detail. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 69 articles and 28 books were ultimately included in the review. The final phase involved data extraction and synthesis.
Findings:
The findings of this review can be organized into three major categories:
1. A three-branch, criterion-based classification of the evolution of psychoanalytic thought on art.
2. A four-stage model explaining the creative process from a postmodern psychoanalytic perspective, illustrating how the elements of artistic creation correspond to mechanisms of psychic transformation.
3. A comparative map outlining the structural and functional components of artistic creation in parallel with analogous processes in psychoanalysis, highlighting their potential impact on the analytic process.
Conclusion:
The study proposes an intersubjective–field (post-Bionian) model of the creative process: evocative objects activate the raw unconscious material within the “field” of the artist’s psychic interactions. This stirred unconscious, driven by the wish to re-experience a transformative object and engaged with consciousness, material, and inner/outer factors, gives rise to the “artistic third,” a concept inspired by the “analytic third,” which is both co-created and autonomous. The artistic third enables the capacity to “bear witness,” facilitating meaning-making and the integration of ruptures in the psyche’s narrative through metaphor and symbolization. Thus, art is not the product of a singular self but the emergent outcome of a dynamic creative field.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)