مطالعۀ پدیدارشناختی واکنش‌های شاهدان فعال و منفعل در رخدادهای قلدری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه روان شناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

چکیده

زمینه: قلدری در دوران نوجوانی یک مسئلۀ اجتماعی گسترده و پیچیده است که تأثیرات عمیقی بر تمام افراد درگیر و به ویژه قربانیان دارد. شناخت رفتارهای شاهدان قلدری و عوامل مؤثر بر رفتار آن‌ها، می‌تواند به ارائۀ راهکارهای مؤثرتری برای مقابله با این پدیده کمک کند. پژوهش‌های گذشته عمدتاً متمرکز بر رفتارهای مرتکبین قلدری و قربانیان بوده‌اند. این در حالی است که گروه عمده‌ای از افراد، شاهدان یا تماشاچیان قلدری هستند که می‌توانند نقش مؤثری در کاهش رفتارهای قلدری در محیط‌های مختلف و از آن جمله در مدرسه داشته باشند.
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، واکاوی تجربۀ زیستۀ نوجوانانِ شاهدِ قلدری بود.
روش: برای دستیابی به هدف پژوهش، از رویکرد کیفی و روش پدیدارشناختی توصیفی استفاده شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان، 12 نفر از دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر متوسطۀ اول و دوم شهرستان بیرجند در سال تحصیلی 1404-1403 بودند که از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و با در نظر گرفتن دو اصل اشباع و کفایت نمونه‌گیری انتخاب شدند. ابزار اصلی جمع‌آوری اطلاعات در مطالعه حاضر، مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته بود. تحلیل داده‌ها، با روش استویک-کولایزی-کین انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌ها، منجر به تولید 6 مضمون اصلی، 15 مضمون فرعی و 31 واحد معنایی گردید. شش مضمون اصلی شامل پویایی‌های قدرت و سلسله‌مراتب اجتماعی (گستاخی و کنترل‌گری)، آسیب‌پذیری و چالش‌های اجتماعی (صفات فردی و مهارت‌های بین فردی)، آشفتگی‌های هیجانی (همدلی و شفقت، بی‌عدالتی اخلاقی، مسئولیت‌پذیری فردی)، واکنش‌های دوگانه (پاسخ‌های انفعالی، مداخلۀ فعال)، اجتناب و محافظت از خود (فقدان جرأت‌ورزی، احتیاط، بی‌تفاوتی و سودجویی) و اثر مثبت اجتماعی (هوش هیجانی، شایستگی اجتماعی و حل تعارض مسالمت‌آمیز) بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های این پژوهش، پیچیدگی و چندبعدی بودن رفتارهای مثبت و منفی شاهدان قلدری که نشانگر عوامل مؤثر متفاوت بر رفتارهای این دو گروه است را مورد تأکید قرار می‌دهد. نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند به طراحی برنامه‌های مداخله‌ای و آموزشی به منظور حمایت از رفتارهای مثبت شاهدان و قربانیان قلدری کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Phenomenological Study of Bystanders’ and Upstanders’ Responses in Bullying Incidents

نویسنده [English]

  • Hadi Samadieh
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Bullying during adolescence presents a significant social issue affecting all individuals involved, especially the victims. Insights into the behaviors of bystanders and upstanders and the factors influencing them can lead to more effective anti-bullying strategies. While previous research has primarily centered on perpetrators and victims, the role of witnesses—who can significantly influence the reduction of bullying in various environments, including schools—remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aims to examine the lived experiences of adolescents who witness bullying.
Method: A qualitative, descriptive phenomenological method was employed to meet the research objective. The study involved 12 male and female students from first and second high schools in Birjand during the 2023-2024 academic year. Participants were selected through purposive sampling (maximum variation) and based on the principles of saturation and sampling adequacy. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method.
Results: Interview data analysis revealed six main themes, 15 sub-themes, and 31 semantic units. The main themes included power dynamics and social hierarchy (arrogance and control), vulnerability and social challenges (personal traits and interpersonal skills), emotional turmoil (empathy and compassion, moral injustice, personal responsibility), ambivalent reactions (passive responses, active intervention), avoidance and self-protection (lack of assertiveness, caution, indifference, and self-interest), and positive social impact (emotional intelligence, social competence, peaceful conflict resolution).
Conclusion: The findings underscore the complexity and multidimensionality of the positive and negative behaviors of bullying witnesses, highlighting various influencing factors. The study’s results can inform the development of intervention and educational programs aimed at promoting positive behaviors among bullying witnesses and supporting victims.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • bullying
  • victimization
  • bystanders
  • upstanders
  • students
  • lived experience

References

  1. Afifi, T. O., Taillieu, T., Salmon, S., Davila, I. G., Stewart-Tufescu, A., Fortier, J., ... & MacMillan, H. L. (2020). Adverse childhood experiences (aces), peer victimization, and substance use among adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 106, 104504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104504
  2. Babaei, A., Vahedi, S., Adib, Y., & Imanzadeh, A. (2021). Lived experience of adolescent boys with the moral disengagement mechanism and bullying: A grounded theory study. Journal of Psychological Science. 20(97), 47-62. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-945-en.html
  3. Bao, Z., Liu, H., & Wang, F. (2024). Patterns of defender behaviors and outsider behaviors in school bullying among Chinese adolescents: based on latent profile analysis. Current Psychology, 43, 33817-33827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06870-0
  4. Biswas, T., Scott, J. G., Munir, K., Thomas, H. J., Huda, M. M., Hasan, M. M., ... & Mamun, A. A. (2020). Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. EClinicalMedicine, 20, 100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276
  5. Camodeca, M., & Nava, E. (2020). The long-term effects of bullying, victimization, and bystander behavior on emotion regulation and its physiological correlates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3-4), NP2056-NP2075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934438
  6. Chan, N. N., Ahrumugam, P., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Ooi, P. B. (2020). A hermeneutic phenomenological study of students' and school counsellors'“lived experiences” of cyberbullying and bullying. Computers & Education, 146, 103755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103755
  7. Chen, L. M., Chang, L. Y. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2016). Choosing to be a defender or an outsider in a school bullying incident: Determining factors and the defending process. School Psychology International, 37(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316632282
  8. Coelho, V. A., Marchante, M., & Romao, A. M. (2022). Adolescents’ trajectories of social anxiety and social withdrawal: Are they influenced by traditional bullying and cyberbullying roles?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102053
  9. Dou, Y., Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., O’Donnell, R., Bunyachatakul, S., & Pojanapotha, P. (2022). Bullying Victimization Moderates The Association Between Social Skills And Self-Esteem Among Adolescents: A cross-sectional study in international schools. Children, 9(11), 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111606
  10. Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2017) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Willig, C. and Stainton-Rogers, W. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Psychology 2nd Edition. London, Sage. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16386
  11. Jankowiak, B., Jaskulska, S., Pérez-Martínez, V., Pyżalski, J., Sanz-Barbero, B., Bowes, N., ... & Vives-Cases, C. (2024). I was the violence victim, i am the perpetrator: bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and associated factors among adolescents. Social Sciences, 13(9), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13090452
  12. Jiang, C., & Shi, J. (2024). The relationship between bullying victimization and problematic behaviors: A focus on the intrapersonal emotional competence and interpersonal social competence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 152, 106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106800
  13. He, D., Niu, G., Hu, Y., Song, K., Zhou, Z., & Fan, C. (2024). The relationship between parental conflict and adolescent cyberbullying: The roles of parent- child attachment and core self- evaluation. Current Psychology, 43(9), 8230-8240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04998-z
  14. Healy, K. L., Scott, J. G. & Thomas, H. J. (2024). The protective role of supportive relationships in mitigating bullying victimization and psychological distress in adolescents. Journal of Child Family and Studies, 33, 3211-3228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02891-2
  15. Heradstveit, O., Hysing, M., Bøe, T., Nilsen, S. A., Sivertsen, B., Bretteville- Jensen, A. L., & Askeland, K. G. (2023). Prospective associations between adolescent risky substance use and school dropout and the role of externalising and internalising problems. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 41(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725231188568
  16. Hikmat, R., Yosep, I., Hernawaty, T., & Mardhiyah, A. (2024). A scoping review of anti-bullying interventions: Reducing traumatic effect of bullying among adolescents. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S443841
  17. Hortensius, R., & De Gelder, B. (2018). From empathy to apathy: The bystander effect revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417749653
  18. Hosseini, S. A., Adib, Y., Eskandar, E., & Babaee, H. (2015). Victimized students' experiences of bullying: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 4(3), 232-243. https://jqr1.kmu.ac.ir/article_90821.html
  19. Kabiri, S., Donner, C. M., Shadmanfaat, S. M., & Rahmati, M. M. (2024). School bullying among iranian adolescents: Considering a higher moderation model in situational action theory. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 6(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-022-00147-5
  20. Kennedy, A., & Brausch, A. M. (2024). Emotion dysregulation, bullying, and suicide behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 15, 100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100715
  21. Konishi, C., Hymel, S., Wong, T. K., & Waterhouse, T. (2021). School climate and bystander responses to bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1557-1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22512
  22. Lai, S., Li, J., Shen, C., Zhang, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., ... & Lu, L. (2024). School bullying victimization and depression symptoms in adolescents: The mediating role of internet addiction and moderating role of living areas. Psychiatric Quarterly, 95(3), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10083-w
  23. Mazzone, A. (2020). Bystanders to bullying: An introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00061-8
  24. Meszaros, G., Horvath, L. O., & Balazs, J. (2017). Self- injury and externalizing pathology: A systematic literature review. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1326-y
  25. Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751-780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
  26. Pecjak, S., Pirc, T., Markovic, R., Špes, T., & Košir, K. (2024). Psychosocial and moral factors of bystanders in peer bullying. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(5), 617-629. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/2291
  27. Pergolizzi, F., Richmond, D., Macario, S., Gan, Z., Richmond, C., & Macario, E. (2009). Bullying in middle schools: Results from a four-school survey. Journal of School Violence, 8(3), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220902910839
  28. Pourtaleb, N., Fathi Azar, E., & Adib, Y. (2019). Investigation of teachers' lived experiences of student's bullying behavior: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 8(2), 143-153. https://jqr1.kmu.ac.ir/article_90963.html
  29. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-02635-001
  30. Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
  31. Samadieh, H., & Khamesan, A. (2024). Bullying interventions: A systematic review of iranian research. Qualitative Research in Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.22077/QRBS.2024.7774.1038
  32. Sjögren, B., Thornberg, R., & Hong, J. S. (2024). Moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy as predictors of bystander behaviors in peer victimization in middle school: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of school psychology, 107, 101400. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39645331/
  33. Sheng, J., Yang, Y., Lin, P., Xiao, Y., Sun, Y., Fei, G., ... & Zhang, X. (2024). The association of school bullying victimization and suicidal ideation among school-aged adolescents in yixing city, china. Journal of Affective Disorders, 365, 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.124
  34. Smith, P. K., Kwak, K., & Toda, Y. (Eds.). (2016). School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139410878
  35. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83
  36. Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Elmelid, R., Johansson, A., & Mellander, E. (2020). Standing up for the victim or supporting the bully? Bystander responses and their associations with moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy, and collective efficacy. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 23(3), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09549-z
  37. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (coreq): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  38. Xing, J., Peng, M., Deng, Z., Chan, K. L., Chang, Q., & Ho, R. T. H. (2022). The prevalence of bullying victimization and perpetration among the school-aged population in chinese communities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(5), 3445-3460. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129595
  39. Waasdorp, T. E., Fu, R., Clary, L. K., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2022). School climate and bullying bystander responses in middle and high school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 80, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412
  40. World Health Organization (2024). Mental Health of adolescents. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
  41. Van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Zwaanswijk, W., Gini, G., & Vedder, P. (2018). Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta-analyses on longitudinal studies. Developmental Review, 49, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.07.001
  42. Zahrani, Y. (2024). The lived experiences of students with bullying in king khalid university: A qualitative approach study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(11), 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111445
  43. Zhou, R., Foo, J. C., Nishida, A., Ogawa, S., Togo, F., & Sasaki, T. (2024). Longitudinal relationships of psychotic-like experiences with suicidal ideation and self- harm in adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(6), 1977-1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02299-1
  44. Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). Empathy and callous- unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683456
پژوهش های کیفی در علوم رفتاری
دوره 3، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6
زمستان 1403
اسفند 1403
صفحه 143-158

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 دی 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 23 اسفند 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار