عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری رابطه و رضایتمندی زوجین سازش یافته بعد از تقاضای طلاق: مطالعۀ پدیدارشناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی دانشگاه بیرجند

چکیده

زمینه: زوج‌هایی که بعد از تقاضای طلاق بتوانند مجددا به سازگاری برسند، ممکن است رابطۀ متزلزلی داشته باشند که نیاز است با شناسایی و تقویت عوامل موثر بر رابطه، ثبات و رضایت از رابطه را بالا برد.
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی کیفی عوامل موثر بر پایداری رابطه و رضایتمندی زوجین سازش یافته بعد از تقاضای طلاق انجام شد.
روش: روش پژوهش کیفی و از نوع پدیدارشناسی بود. جامعۀ پژوهش، شامل کلیۀ زوج‌های سازش یافته بعد از تقاضای طلاق شهر بیرجند از سال 1396 تا 1401 و مراجعه کننده به مرکز مشاوره راه نو بودند. بر اساس ملاک‌های ورود به پژوهش، 7 زوج (14 نفر) به صورت هدفمند انتخاب و مورد مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته قرار گرفتند. فرایند انتخاب نمونه‌ها تا مرحلۀ اشباع نظری پیش رفت. داده‌های به دست آمده توسط روش کولایزی و نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. کدگذاری داده‌ها به صورت باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: در تحلیل تجارب مشارکت‌کنندگان 16 مضمون فرعی و 5 درون‌مایه اصلی شامل ویژگی‌های فردی، ویژگی‌های تعاملی/ارتباطی، عوامل خانوادگی، عوامل فرهنگی-اجتماعی و پایبندی به ارزش‌ها شناسایی شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بنابراین می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که مجموعه‌ای از عوامل فردی، بین‌فردی و اجتماعی در پایداری و رضایت زوج‌های سازش‌یافته بعد از درخواست طلاق اثرگذار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Factors Affecting Relationship Stability and Satisfaction in the Couples Compromising After Applying for Divorce: A Phenomenological Study

نویسنده [English]

  • Samaneh Khazaei
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Couples who are able to compromise again after applying for divorce may have a fragile relationship; therefore, it is necessary to increase the stability and satisfaction of the relationship by identifying the influencing factors.
Aim: the present qualitative study was conducted to investigate the factors affecting the marital stability and satisfaction of couples who compromise after asking for divorce.
Method: The research method was qualitative and phenomenological. The population included all couples who compromised after asking for divorce in Birjand City, and referred to Rah-e-No Counseling Center from 2017 to 2022. Based on the criteria already determined, 7 couples (14 people) were selected via purposive sampling and subjected to semi-structured interviews. It should be noted that the process of selecting samples continued up to theoretical saturation. The obtained data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s method and MAXQDA software. Data coding was done using an open, axial, and selective method.
Results: The analysis of participants’ experiences revealed 16 sub-themes and 5 main themes, including individual characteristics, interactive/communicative characteristics, family factors, socio-cultural factors and commitment to values.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that a set of individual, interpersonal, and social factors influence the stability and satisfaction of couples who have compromised after applying for divorce.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • marital stability
  • marital satisfaction
  • compromise
  • divorce

مراجع

Alghafli, Z., Hatch, T., & Marks, L. (2014). Religion and relationships in muslim families: A qualitative examination of devout married muslim couples. Religions, 5(3), 814-833. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel5030814
Bachand, L. L., & Caron, S. L. (2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828317271
Bashirgonbadi, S., Dargahi, S., Ahmadboukani, S., & Fadakar, P. (2021). Examinning the causal model of marital satisfaction based on attachment styles with the mediating role of triangulation. Journal of health, 12(1), 37-49. http://healthjournal.arums.ac.ir/article-1-2358-en.html
Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2020). Facebook intensity, social network support, stability and satisfaction in long-distance and geographically-close romantic relationships: A test of a mediation model. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research in Cyberspace, 14(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-2-5
Campbell, K., Wright, D. W., & Flores, C. G. (2012). Newlywed women’s marital expectations: lifelong monogamy?. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53(2), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.651966
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978) Psychological research as a phenomenologist view it. In: Valle, R.S. and King, M. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
David, P., & Stafford, L. (2013). A relational approach to religion and spirituality in marriage: The role of couples’ religious communication in marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x13485922
Dowling, M. (2007). From husserl to van manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
Dutta, R. R., Wu, A. T., Picton, B., Shah, S., Chernyak, M., Bauer, K., Solomon, S., Chang, J., Nguyen, B., Jiang, M., & Hurria, A. (2024). Physician marriage survey reveals sex and specialty differences in marital satisfaction factors. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55437-3
Fivecoat, H. C., Tomlinson, J. M., Aron, A., & Caprariello, P. A. (2014). Partner support for individual self-expansion opportunities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 368-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514533767
Ghezelsefloo, M., Jazayeri, R., Bahrami, F., & Mohammadi, R. (2016). Relationship between original family health and self-compassion with marital commitment. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 26(139), 137-148. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-8163-en.html
Hatami Varzaneh, A., Esmaeily, M., & Borjali, A. (2017). Long term satisfied marriage model: A grounded theory study. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 6(1), 120-149. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516654.1395.6.1.7.0
Hinkelmann, F. (2022). Marriage and family in different cultures throughout history-a historical overview. SCIENTIA MORALITAS International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 145-167. https://www.scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/123
Howell, P. (2023). Marital status influence on satisfaction/happiness. In F. Maggino (Eds.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1730
Huang, Y., & Ma, Y. (2024). Climate change and divorce behavior: Implication for family education. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100115
Imanzadeh, V., Moheb, N., Abdi, R., & Honarmand Azimi, M. (2021). Identifying effective factors on divorce and providing a model for divorce prediction using modelling of a data mining decision tree. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 12(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2021.308375.643607
Jomenia, S., Nazariy, A., & Solimanian, A. (2021). Identifying the indicators of the problems of couples seeking a divorce in Torkaman city. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 2(3), 170-195. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172430.1400.2.3.9.4
Kahrizeh, M., Saberi, M., & Bashirgonbadi, S. (2020). Effect of spiritual-religious interventions on anxiety, depression, and adjustment to parental divorce in female high school students. Health Spiritual Med Ethics,7(2), 2-8. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224304.2020.7.2.6.4
Khodadadi Sangdeh, J., Nazari, A. M., Ahmadi, K., & Hasani, J. (2014). Identifying indices of successful marriage: A discovering and qualitative research. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 13(25), 9-24. https://faslname.msy.gov.ir/article_53.html?lang=en
Koraei, A., Khojaste Mehr, R., Sodani, M., & Aslani, K. (2017). Identification of the factors contributing to satisfying stable marriages in women. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 6(2), 129-164. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516654.1395.6.2.7.2
Kuru Sönmez, Ö., & Yakut, E. (2024). Determination of the factors affecting divorce in türkiye according to gender: A research with tuik data. Sosyo Ekonomi, 32(59), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.05
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Miller, P. J. E., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2003). Trait expressiveness and marital satisfaction: the role of idealization processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(4), 978-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00978.x
Nindyasari, Y., & Herawati, T. (2018). The relation of emotional maturity, family interaction and marital satisfaction of early age married couples. Journal of Family Sciences, 3(2), 16-29. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jfs/article/view/25446
Rajaei Ghazilou, D., Shariatmadar, A., & Farrokhi, N. (2021). Life satisfaction and marital satisfaction based on lived experiences of working and housewives: A phenomenological study. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 15(1), 95-115. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084331.1400.15.1.5.0
Rotz, D. (2015). Why have divorce rates fallen? The role of womens age at marriage. ˜The œJournal of Human Resources, 51(4), 961-1002. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.4.0214-6224r
Salimi, H., Javdan, M., Zarei, E., & Najarpourian, S. (2019). The health of marital relationship in the light of factors affecting the stability and satisfaction of the relationship: A review study. Journal of Education and Community Health, 6(3), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.29252/jech.6.3.183
Salvatore, J. E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J., Sundquist, K., & Kendler, K. S. (2024). family genetic-risk profiles associated with divorce. Clinical Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231214204
Slatcher, R. B., & Schoebi, D. (2017). Protective processes underlying the links between marital quality and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.002
Tumin, D. (2017). Does marriage protect health? A birth cohort comparison. Social Science Quarterly, 99(2), 626-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12425
Walsh, F. (2006). Strengthening family resilience. New York: Guilford Press.
Wang, Y., Haslam, M., Yu, M., Ding, J., Lu, Q., & Pan, F. (2015). Family functioning, marital quality and social support in Chinese patients with epilepsy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0208-6
Wilson, A. (2015). A guide to phenomenological research. Nursing Standard, 29(34), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.34.38.e8821
Yoo, G., & Joo, S. (2022). Love for a marriage story: The association between love and marital satisfaction in middle adulthood. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(6), 1570-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02055-6
پژوهش های کیفی در علوم رفتاری
دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 4
زمستان 1402
اسفند 1402
صفحه 27-42

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 26 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 دی 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار