نقد کتاب: تحلیل محتوای "مغز و آموزش"

نوع مقاله : نقد کتاب

نویسندگان

1 1) استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، موسسه آموزش عالی فروردین، قایمشهر، ایران

2 2) استاد،گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

زمینه: یادگیری مبتنی بر مغز، به عنوان یک پارادایم نوین، چهارچوبی نظری برای یادگیری کارآمد، فرایند تدریس و شرایطی که سبب یادگیری بهتر در مغز می‌گردد فراهم می‌سازد. این اصول متخصصان را برای انتخاب و فراهم آوردن فضای مناسب یادگیری هدایت می‌کند.
هدف: هدف اصلی این پژوهش، نقد و ارزشیابی کیفی کتاب مغز و آموزش بر اساس شاخص‌های علمی و تعیین نقاط قوت و ضـعف آن است.
روش: این مطالعه با روش پژوهش کیفی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا به دو صورت شکلی و محتوایی، امتیازات و کاستی‌های آن مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. بر این اساس ترجمه کتاب « مغز و آموزش» اثر اریک جنسن ترجمه سپیده رضوی و لیلی محمدحسین از انتشارات مدرسه مورد نقد و بررسی قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: ترجمه کتاب از نظر ساختار و سازماندهی مطالب، ویژگی‌های نگارشی، مباحث اساسی دارای امتیازات لازم است. از سوی دیگر کتاب به دلیل نبود منبع پایان متنی، نبود جمع‌بندی و خلاصه بحث، طراحی رنگ و جلد مناسب ..... دارای کاستی‌هایی است.
نتیجه‌گیری: رفع کاستی‌های کتاب « مغز و آموزش» می‌تواند در افزایش اثرگذاری کتاب بر روی مخاطبان نقش قابل توجهی داشته باشد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Book Review: Content Analysis of "Brain and Education"

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra RajabpourAzizi 1
  • Mahmood Mehrmohammdi Mehrmohammdi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Farvardin Institute of Higher Education, Qaemshahr, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Education, University of Tarbiat Modarres, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Brain-based learning, as a new paradigm, provides a theoretical framework for efficient learning, teaching process and conditions that cause better learning in the brain. These principles guide professionals to choose and provide a suitable learning environment.
Aim: The main purpose of this research is to review and evaluate the quality of the brain and education book based on scientific indicators and determine its strengths and weaknesses.
Method: This study was conducted using the qualitative research method and using the content analysis method in both form and content to study its strengths and weaknesses. The translation of the book "Brain and Education" by Eric Jensen, translated by Sepideh Razavi and Laili Mohammad Hossein, was reviewed by the school's publications.
Results: The translation of the book has the necessary advantages in terms of the structure and organization of the content, writing features, basic topics. On the other hand, the book has some shortcomings due to the lack of source of the end of the text, lack of conclusion and summary of the discussion, suitable color and cover design.
Conclusions: Fixing the shortcomings of the book "Brain and Education" can play a significant role in increasing the effectiveness of the book on the audience.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • brain-based learning
  • curriculum
  • education
  • book review
  • qualitative content analysis
Arshad, M., & Kasefi, S. (2021). The effect of brain-centered empowerment on the executive functions of students with mathematical learning disabilities. Community Health Journal, 15(2), 12-20. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23456248.1400.15.2.2.2
Awolola, S. A. (2011). Effect of brain-based learning strategy on students' achievement in senior secondary school mathematics in oyo state, Nigeria. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 91-106. http://www.cjes.eu/
Bonomo, V. (2017). Brain-based learning theory. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6 (1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n1a3
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Delrouz, K., & Qarabaghi, H. (2023). A critical review on the book "introduction to educational technology". Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences), 23(3), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2023.39404.2460
Duman, B. (2010). The effects of brain-based learning on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles. kuram ve uygulamada eğitim bilimleri, 10(4), 2077-2103. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919873.pdf
Ebadi, T. (2017). The effectiveness of essay teaching method with brain-centered learning approach on students' academic self-efficacy beliefs and writing skills. Sociology of Education, 8, 80-93. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/387690
Eisner, E. W. (2002). Educational imagination: On the design and evalution of school programs (3rd Edition). Pearson.
Hall, J. (2005). Neuroscience and education: What can brain science contribute to teaching and learning? The SCRE Centre, University of Glasgow.
Hlebowitsh, P. (2012). When best practices aren’t: A schwabian perspective on teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.637184
Jensen, E. P. (2008). A fresh look at Brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(6), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170808900605
Jensen, E. P. (2009). Brain-centered learning: a new paradigm of education (S. Saifi and N. Nusrati., Trans.). Rushd Farhang Publications.
Khalili Sadrabad, A., & Ebrahimi Qawam, S. (2013). Brain-based learning, a new strategy in learning. The 1st National Conference on Sustainable Development in Educational Sciences and Psychology, Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Mehr Arvand Institute of Higher Education. https://civilica.com/doc/320647
Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.4.4lm3811r1033431n
McAteer T. C. (2010). Connecting brain research to classroom learning: A mixed-method study on how teachers apply brain research to their instruction. University of La Verne. https://researchworks.laverne.edu/esploro/outputs/doctoral
Mekarina, M., & Ningsih, Y. P. (2017). The effects of brain based learning approach on motivation and students achievement in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 895, 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012057
Nouri, A., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2010). Critical explanation of the place of neuroscience in the field of educational knowledge and practice. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 83-100. http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-110-en.html
Noureen, G. h., Nisa Awan, R., & Fatim, H. (2017). Effect of brain-based learning on academic achievement of vii graders in mathematics. Journal of Elementary Education, 27(2), 85-97. https:// researchgate.net/publication/326224183
Saleh, S., & Mazlan, A. (2019). The effects of brain-based teaching with i-think maps and brain gym approach towards physics understanding. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16022
Schön, D. A. (1992). The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 6(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561829209049595
Saifi, S., Ebrahimigavam, S., & Farokhi, N. (2010). Effect of brain-based learning on comprehension and pace of learning of grade 3 primary school students. Journal of Educational Innovations, 9(2), 45-60. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_78925.html?lang=en
Sousa, D. A. (2016). How the brain learns. Corwin Press on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4):2077-103.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educationa Publishers.
Talkhabi, M. (2008). Brain-based curriculum. Journal of Educational Innovations, 7(26), 127-150. https://www.sid.ir/paper/75344/en
Talkhabi, M. (2012). The connection between neuroscience and education: Challenges and hopes. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 9-22. http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-480-en.html